02
Jul

Building a community – The 11 Rules

I watched with great dismay this week as PeopleAggregator launched and created a swirl of negative comment due to the slightly spammy nature of Marc Canter’s invites to anyone who had ever mailed him. I have huge respect for Marc and his vision, passion, directness and energy but he really made a pigs ear of the launch. Instead of everyone discussing all of the possibilities created by PeepAg, the buzz just fizzled almost immediately.

I had been asking myself how they can regain the momentum in terms of getting people involved and excited but luckily Tara Hunt has answered that. Marc is a customer of hers and she lists a wonderful set of rules for operating in this space.

Rules of engagement for community building:

1. be patient
2. be part of the community you serve
3. build something amazing and they will come
4. SPAM means that if someone hasn’t expressed interest explicitly (i.e. signed up, then opted in to receive emails), don’t send email
5. it’s all in the organic growth…that means 100% natural
6. limit outgoing messages altogether, unless they are incredibly personal
7. work with the grassroots, not against it
8. concentrate on individual relationships, not mass messaging
9. involve the community early on in the development process
10. trust is the new currency…if you spend it, you can’t replenish it – it’s a valuable, non-renewable resource
11. be patient

I think these rules will be quoted over and over in the coming year. I’ve printed them out and stuck them to my wall. We are in the very early days of building what I hope will be a globally successful product. Up until Monday I had thought about the launch and initial growth of the product in general terms but the stumbling of PeepAg means that rule number 9 in particular moves to the top of my list.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

About Conor O'Neill

6 Comments for this entry

Walter Higgins
July 2nd, 2006 on 3:07 am

Can’t wait to hear more about what you’re working on.

Conor O'Neill
July 2nd, 2006 on 3:07 am

I’m still wrestling with the timing of when I openly discuss what the plan is. Watch this space!

raju
July 2nd, 2006 on 3:41 pm

Conor, don’t be too disappointed. These things happen and they are a good lesson. We are here to learn things and improve our approach to the solution of complex situations. In my opinion there are not many people who really understand the whole concept of the PeopleAggregator since it is so far reaching. In such a situation people tend to see only the negative aspects of something.

Well, Rome was not built in one day and it takes time to start such a revolution. Tara is right in that you should try to get everyone on your side from the community. So the key aspect will be to properly communicate how this revolution is going to serve all of us. Let’s make the advantages of this technology visible to anyone. It’s going to be a tough job but we can do it.

Conor O'Neill
July 2nd, 2006 on 3:41 pm

I completely agree Raju, communication is key. One area that Marc is right to focus on is the the huge benefit of not being locked-in to any system.

One area of confusion that does need to be cleared up in the public’s mind is the difference between the platform and the specific implementation in PeopleAggregator.net.

Keith Bohanna
July 3rd, 2006 on 4:03 am

Same as Walter – will be interested to see your idea when you pop above the parapet!

keith

Conor O'Neill
July 24th, 2006 on 11:58 am

Test